Law and Other things and the Indian Express have a series of posts and articles on Mayawati and her understanding of the constitution; the latest being Vinay Sitapati’s article in the Indian Express available here.
In a gist, Vinay argues that while most legal commentators view individual rights as being the core of the Constitution, group identities as mere political concessions, Mayawati subscribes to the inverse idea — of the Constitution being a power-sharing agreement between groups. He also adds that in Mayawati’s view, the provisions for weaker sections were the result of a political compromise.
Perhaps the only politician who is so vocal about the constitution during the times of elections has been Mayawati and we must give the devil her due for that. She also has raised some serious questions that Vinay brings forth but doesn’t go further into. For instance, would we have specific provisions for the minorities if there hadn’t been a political compromise as he puts it ?
Most of the provisions today in the Constitution talk of group rights and identities within the paradigm of individual rights; Articles 15, 16 (reservations), prohibition of untouchability (Article 17), rights to administer minority institutions (Article 30) etc…. They make you think as to whether they would’ve existed even if there wasn’t an Ambedkar in the 1950s being a part of drafting the Constitution. I wasn’t alive back in the 1950’s but the recent examples of South Africa and its struggle for the inclusion for group rights makes me understand that it surely wasn’t an easy thing to attain and incorporate. Readers may read Barbara Oomen’s article here to get an idea of the same.
In the Constitution, we do talk of the individuality of rights. That part III incorporates the civil and political rights that are primarily individual in nature and part IV is to have social and economic rights that are group rights. But having a lot of these group rights in part III for the benefit of minorities is not such a bad thing either. India and now South Africa mark a shift in this traditionalist thinking and perhaps maybe for the better. If the Constitution is a power sharing agreement between groups, then the rights are surely the result of a political compromise. It took 300 odd people sitting for more than 2 years to debate and frame our constitution, in exchange for the discrimination that the dalits had faced and their rights (may be not for a separate state as mayawati argues though) some provisions in Part III may be considered as a compromise to them.
11 comments
Comments feed for this article
October 27, 2010 at 5:34 pm
Ankit
The no 1 rated penny stock newsletter sign up for penny stock news, stock alerts, day trading and penny stock investment
January 4, 2011 at 6:58 pm
haber53
thank you goodday
March 23, 2012 at 10:01 pm
kasser2013
Nice and great post.
Thanks & regrads.
March 24, 2012 at 3:26 am
kasser2013
Nice and great post.
Thanks & regards.
August 7, 2012 at 7:08 pm
questions to friends
Excellent post!!
December 8, 2012 at 11:49 am
ram.tweakcoders.in» Blog Archive » Mayawati and the Political Compromise
[…] View the Original article […]
August 16, 2013 at 8:44 am
ogrzewanie domu
It’s true, this world is ugly
October 2, 2013 at 12:08 pm
Yewtek Solutions Pvt. Ltd
I am a web developer in Yewtek Solutions wanted to improve my knowledge. It is a chandigarh base web development company. Yewtek fullfill need of website in chandigarh.
Regarding to this post, nice way is defined. Some of the tips you mention, I have read before but some excellent new ideas is this.
Mostly i only check the web development, web designing and app development blog only but prefer to have all round knowledge.
May 4, 2014 at 1:17 pm
Mirlla
Excellent post. Thanks for sharing this information
February 9, 2015 at 10:45 am
Kunal Jain
Hi,
We appreciate your blog and the content available on it. We would like to upload articles written by you and/or the content published on your blog to http://politicaltimesindia.com/. Political Times India is an online platform for citizen journalists to voice their opinions on Indian Political matters. You will receive acknowledgements for your posts/articles. Links to the same will be appended to them as well. Kindly contact us if you are interested in publishing your content on our website. Thank You.
April 7, 2016 at 5:10 am
Priya
If the Constitution is a power sharing agreement between groups, then the rights are surely the result of a political compromise.http://kanoonquestions.com/I hope it reaches your targetted audience. all the best thank you.
Enjoyed looking at this, very good stuff, appreciate it.